In 2025, the digital divide is no longer just about access to the internet—it’s about how information is structured, who can engage with it, and whether institutions are truly committed to digital inclusion. Public-facing documents—especially PDFs—remain the go-to format for forms, notices, applications, and policy resources across government agencies, universities, and public health systems. Yet as more Americans rely on screen readers, mobile devices, and assistive technologies, these once-convenient files have become serious accessibility barriers. If your organization needs help making your PDFs accessible, now is the time to act.

The conversation has shifted from legal compliance to human-centered design, and the demand for inclusive documentation is growing louder. Across the U.S., accessibility-related lawsuits are increasing, federal mandates are becoming stricter, and communities are calling for meaningful digital equity. The result is a nationwide movement among public institutions to move beyond the status quo and make PDF accessibility a cornerstone of their digital transformation strategies.Here are nine reasons why U.S. public institutions are urgently rethinking PDF accessibility in 2025.

Digital Equity Is Now a Policy Imperative, Not a Preference

In recent years, digital equity has moved from a buzzword to a cornerstone of public service. The Biden Administration’s Executive Order on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce (EO 14035) mandates that accessibility be built into the fabric of all public-facing digital content. Public institutions are under growing pressure to ensure that PDFs—often used for tax documents, benefits enrollment, and vital records—are not digitally excluding people with disabilities.

By 2025, states such as California, New York, and Massachusetts have incorporated accessibility audits into their standard procurement processes. Local governments are following suit, making accessibility a funding condition for community programs. What once was seen as a compliance checkbox is now considered a civic obligation.

Legal Risks Are Mounting as Courts Rule in Favor of Accessibility

PDFs that aren’t machine-readable or screen-reader compatible have landed several institutions in legal hot water. In one landmark case in 2024, the National Federation of the Blind v. University of Texas System resulted in a significant settlement after the court found hundreds of inaccessible PDFs on university websites. The ruling set a new precedent: hosting inaccessible content is no longer tolerated under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.

With lawsuits on the rise—up 27% in 2024 according to Seyfarth Shaw LLP’s ADA Title III News & Insights—public institutions are now preemptively addressing document accessibility to mitigate risk and liability. Legal compliance is no longer reactive; it’s strategic.

Assistive Technology Usage Has Skyrocketed Across Demographics

Screen readers, text-to-speech tools, and browser-based accessibility extensions are no longer niche technologies. From veterans using VA benefits platforms to students accessing university syllabi, the demand for readable PDFs spans all age groups.

Research by the Pew Research Center in early 2025 shows that 1 in 4 Americans rely on some form of assistive technology while navigating government or healthcare sites. PDFs that lack proper tagging, alt text, or logical reading order often render critical information unreadable to these users. In response, public institutions are investing in document remediation services and staff training to ensure equitable access for all.

Federal Agencies Are Holding Subcontractors Accountable

One major change in 2025 is that the federal government is tightening its expectations—not just for its own agencies, but also for third-party vendors. If a nonprofit or private firm receives federal funds or contracts, its digital deliverables must now comply with Section 508.

The U.S. Department of Education issued updated guidance in January 2025 requiring that all grantee reports, including PDFs, be submitted in accessible formats. Similar policies are being adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services, especially for Medicaid-related communications. Public institutions are reevaluating their vendor partnerships and internal workflows to meet these stricter expectations.

Mobile-First Design Is Exposing PDF Limitations

As public institutions increasingly adopt mobile-first strategies, they’re realizing how poorly many PDFs perform on phones and tablets. Fixed-layout documents may look pristine on desktop but become unreadable or unresponsive on smaller screens—especially if they aren’t properly tagged.

In cities such as Austin, Seattle, and Chicago, municipal agencies are responding to complaints from residents who can’t navigate PDF utility bills or application forms on mobile devices. The solution? Either converting static documents into HTML-based formats or ensuring all PDFs meet WCAG 2.2 mobile accessibility guidelines.

Generative AI Is Accelerating Document Remediation—But Needs Human Oversight

AI-powered tools are now capable of bulk-remediating PDFs for accessibility, including auto-tagging text, generating alt text, and repairing reading orders. Tools from companies such as CommonLook and Equidox are helping public institutions tackle large backlogs of legacy documents.

However, AI isn’t a silver bullet. Human validation remains essential to ensure semantic accuracy, especially in forms, tables, and legal documents. As such, public institutions are adopting hybrid models—using AI for speed and accessibility experts for precision—to modernize at scale without compromising quality.

Public Feedback Loops Are Driving Policy Change

In 2025, accessibility isn’t just being mandated from above—it’s being demanded from below. Advocacy groups, disability rights organizations, and community watchdogs are using public comment periods, FOIA requests, and social media to call out inaccessible PDFs on government sites.

Platforms such as Accessibility Insights and Access Now have started publishing open audits of public sector digital content. In turn, agencies are launching user advisory panels that include individuals with disabilities to test content before publication. This participatory approach ensures real-world usability, not just technical compliance.

Interagency Collaboration Is Leading to Best Practices and Shared Tools

Federal, state, and local institutions are no longer tackling PDF accessibility in isolation. In 2025, networks such as the Accessible Digital Document Community of Practice (hosted by the GSA) are helping public agencies share templates, toolkits, and lessons learned.

For instance, Washington State’s Office of the CIO launched a centralized document remediation service for all state departments. In New York, the MTA collaborated with disability groups to redesign PDF-based train schedules using feedback from blind users. These collaborative initiatives are accelerating the transition to accessible digital ecosystems.

Inclusive Content Is Enhancing Trust and Engagement

Perhaps the most compelling reason public institutions are rethinking PDF accessibility in 2025 is that it strengthens trust. When users feel seen, respected, and able to access the same information as everyone else, engagement rises.

Accessible PDFs allow parents to fill out school enrollment forms without assistance, enable seniors to download healthcare information independently, and let multilingual users access alternative text in their preferred languages. The ripple effect is profound: inclusivity drives participation, and participation fuels better governance.

Conclusion: Building a More Accessible Future, One Document at a Time

PDF accessibility is no longer a fringe concern or a burdensome technicality. In 2025, it stands at the intersection of law, technology, public service, and human dignity. Public institutions—from local school boards to federal agencies—are embracing accessible PDFs not just to avoid lawsuits or tick compliance boxes, but to fulfill their mission of serving every citizen equitably.

For public-sector leaders, the path forward is clear: audit existing PDFs, adopt accessibility-first authoring practices, and collaborate with experts to build sustainable systems. As we move further into the digital era, accessibility isn’t just a best practice—it’s a moral mandate. And with the right tools, partnerships, and perspective, public institutions can turn every PDF from a locked gate into an open door.

Become a Member to post Articles Back to Profile